Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Portfolio Cover Letter

Daneka Gibson
ENC 1101
Professor Longhany
December 3, 2016

Portfolio Cover Letter
            Throughout this semester in ENC1101, I have learned a lot of things about myself and my writings.  I believe the constant essays and the chance to allow myself to improve helped me in ways that I would not have if I didn’t attend this class. There are 4 outcomes that I was expected to meet and whether I did or not should have shown in my writing
Outcome 1
            I demonstrated an understanding for the writing process but I believe that in the beginning my writing was very lazy. When coming into this class the first essay we had was the Literacy Narrative, because I was so used to writing high school prompted essays when it came down to how to write new essays I was stuck. I tend to not retain memory that I don’t care for so having to really think about my past experiences, so when I had to it was hard especially since my literacy past was not so advanced and I expressed that in the essay when I said ” So I was basically just “half doing things” and skimming through books just to get the information that I need out of it and then I was done with it. Now, I barely read books and its really messing me up having to read hundreds of pages a week for multiple classes”.
Outcome 2
            I didn’t demonstrate awareness of rhetorical situations. The whole way throughout using rhetorical situations I was confused and all the times I tried to look it up and read the text it appears it wasn’t coming to me in the way that I wanted it to. In the essay contest/ rhetorical analysis we had to use our skill on rhetorical situations and I believe that was my worse essay just based on my lack of knowledge to understand the rhetorical situations. It made my essay dull and repetitive because I didn’t know so I was just rambling to say something to fill the essay up. I did though know how to change my writing up to fit different writing contexts. When writing the contest portion on the analysis/contest I wrote very well and probably because it was on a topic that appealed to me and a lot of other people I the world ad because I got to changed up the way that I write. I had a prompt to follow yet I was free to say what I wanted to say and I could be flexible with my writing and change it up to make it appealing to whomever would read it.
Outcome 3
            I could demonstrate my capabilities as a reader of complex text. Throughout the semester, every essay we had we were appointed to review out peer’s papers and give feedback.  By reviewing essays, I could look at different way that people write their essays and give them advice on how I write mine.  By having my essays reviewed I could retain that information that people were giving me and noticing the obvious mistakes that I had failed to see that they pointed out to me so that I could correct them and make my essay better. Peer reviews gave me the chance to really review myself before other did just out of habit. It helped me be more detailed and more aware of my may grammar issues that would help my essay be better.
Outcome 4:
            I demonstrated an awareness of the relationship between disclosure conventions, lexis, genres, and their communities by analyzing Beyoncé’s fan base the Beyhive.  In my ethnography, I identified the way that Beyoncé communicated directly with her fans, how they feel about her and how they communicate between themselves. I also showed how them as a fan base with do anything to back Beyoncé up from people who talked down or about her. From my ethnography, I got that the community of people all around the world communicate for one thing and that fascinated me that different cultures of people could come together for one thing. All my papers from this semester were MLA formatted.